| Posted on : 29th Mar 2010 |
 Get updates on RSS
<< prev next >> |
Some please explain this
| nikhil 29th Mar 2010
| yeah!! this is a good questiom |
| Sagar 29th Mar 2010
| Nice optical illusion! Will investigate further :) |
| Prateeksha 29th Mar 2010
| Nice. What is happening here is this. If you purely count only the heads, one guy in the bottom setup does not have a head.ie the front guy in the column second from the left.this guy has no representation from the top panels. Instead teh shoes of the guy above him form his head. Hence there is one head less in the bottom setup and there is one head less in the top setup(math is still perfect) just that the head that is missing in the bottom setup is barely noticeable whereas the head missing in the top setup is the biggest and very noticeable hence accounting for one whole new person. And all the other heads have been moved around makign this possible. Another way of putting this would be, if you count the no of pixels that are not white in the top setup as well as the second setup it would be exactly the same, all the pixels that were used to form the guy missing in the top setup has been used to make the top portions of all the guys in the upper setup slightly bigger or fancier. |
| mmmm 29th Mar 2010
| Oh cool. This is awesome :) |
| nikhil 30th Mar 2010
| i shall get back to you on this |